For many people judging the match coverage is sometimes as important as judging the match itself. For others, the mute button becomes their best friend so it doesn't matter whether its Clive Tyldesley or John Motson commentating; Lineker or Chiles in the studio.

For me, it's not a decision I make based on the sound of someones voice although, occasionally, a commentators style can seriously irk me. For example I have very little time for Jonathan Pearce. I know he has something of a cult following for some but, for me, his over the top rants rarely make a lot of sense and make me cringe. While we're here, I suppose, I may as well start with the commentators. Growing up, the two 'big guns' were Motson and Brian Moore and, I have to say, I loved them both. Motty has become known as the statto of football commentary, and probably played on that for the last few years, but regardless he is still an institution. I'm not sure whether he ever actually said the line but I hope the story about him introducing a matchin the '70s by saying "For those of you watching in black and white, Tottenham are the team in the all yellow strip" is true. The very fact he is still going after forty years says it all.
Brian Moore just had a great commentators voice. As a Liverpool fan I will never ever forgot those immortal words; "Thomas...it's up for grabs now!". Depressingly I didn't even need to look that up and I'm sure many fans have a line from Moore that sticks in their head. What I liked most about him was his ability, much like Sky's Martin Tyler with the title winning Aguero goal, to know when to speak and when to let the football and the crowd take over. A personal favourite of mine was always Barry Davies. Here was a man than covered almost every sport on the box from football to hockey to even the tennis! His agonising "Oooooohhhh no!" as Kopke saved Southgate's penalty is as much a memory of that night as Andy Moeller's embarrassing celebration a few minutes later.
So what about today's men in the gantry? Well as this is a debate centring on the BBC and ITV, Tyler is unfortunately void which is a shame because he is probably the best. Leaving him aside it's not an easy task to pick someone who will be remembered as fondly in twenty years time as those I've already mentioned. I detest Tyldesley with a passion. I know all commentators will research their match and have countless sheets of information in front of them, but Tyldesley seems to simply read his like an autocue. I'm sure even United fans are tired of his insistence of mentioning the final few minutes at the Nou Camp in every match he does. I'm not suggesting, by the way, that he supports the Red Devils just that he knows that without THAT match he would most likely be an unknown former commentator by now. Besides Motson the best the BBC have on offer is Guy Mowbray. He's not bad but when Lineker says the words "In the commentary box tonight, we have Guy Mowbray" your heart does sink a little as you wonder where Motty is.
The role of co-commentator is sometime undervalued. For me a good assistant, with real football experience, is vital. As much as David Pleat struggles to say any name harder to pronounce than John, he does know his football. The same can be said about Andy Townsend but, with this role, football fans are usually swayed by club loyalty. If you support United, you hate listening to Lawrenson; if you support Spurs, you hate listening to Alan Smith. And if you like football in general, you hate Robbie Savage. Quite often, like Savage (you don't often see those two words together), co-commentators have an agenda. This is their opportunity to make a name for themselves and many have since gone on to be successful after a short spell beside a commentator. No one can tell me Gary Neville signed up to Sky thinking he would never become a coach. It was all part of his plan and, in the studio he is excellent at analysing matches as any seasoned footballer should be. He is, however, awful as a co-commentator mostly due to his weak voice, but I could listen to him discuss tactics all day. Unfortunately Savage is trying to become an Adrian Durham-and I've absolutely no doubt he will succeed because they are both annoying, over-opinionated pond life.

The real battle between the two stations is normally fought in the studios. In many ways this shows the reality of modern day, business driven football. The huge amounts of money that must be spent on this side of a major tournament is staggering; not to mention paying the hotel fees for all the pundits involved. For me this is when the battle is at its fiercest. I like to think of myself, in the words of Brendan Rodgers and Pep Guardiola (again a few words you never thought you would see together), as a student of the game; I'm always learning and eager to hear what those who achieved something in the game have to say. For years the BBC had this sewn up as ITV chose celebrity over football knowledge but now, finally, they have cottoned on. Well, almost. Gary Lineker, 80 caps and 48 international goals, versus Adrian Chile - that guy off Daybreak. Game over. Lineker is a legend and, in my opinion, should give more of his own thoughts during a match instead of just asking the questions. Chiles, on the other hand, should go back to breakfast TV so it's easier for me to avoid him.
The pundit battle is fascinating though, especially if you can put aside club passion and be objective.
BBC
Hansen is superb. Of course he supports Liverpool but he never claims otherwise. But if you look back over the last ten years of his BBC predictions he has actually backed United for the title almost every time. His analysis is rarely wrong - "You don't win anything with kids" aside - and, had he not suffered so badly with nerves on match days, he probably would have been a fine manager. Lawrenson is always direct with his opinions and has developed his style over the years whereas Shearer, unfortunately, continues to make Pinocchio look increasingly like a real boy.
I'm still convinced that Dixon is onomatopoeic. The powers that be at the BBC seem to like him though, judging by the fact that he is on Match of the Day more often than Stoke, but I just can't warm to him. He never seems sure whether or not what he is saying is right and, if he isn't convinced, why should we be? The three big signings for the Beeb will certainly be interesting. Clarence Seedorf is definitely positive; the man oozes as much class in the studio as he (still) does on the pitch. Klinnsmann has been on before and I have to say, I like him. He always looked like a thinker on the game, even during his playing days, and I look forward to hearing his opinions on his native Germany as they, no doubt, sweep their way towards the final. But the boldest signing by the BBC is definitely Harry Redknapp (unless he changes his mind); although I'm not 100% sure it is the wisest move he has ever made. In fact it might end up on a par with the whole doggie bank account fiasco. As the rejected England candidate every word he utters about Roy's Boys will be scrutinised, repeated and discussed. Is he being smug when he points out flaws in the team? Why doesn't he look happier when his country is winning etc? Mind you maybe he realises that, by the end of summer, he might be looking for an income so it's worth the risk.
Underneath the elite team, the Beeb have also enlisted Niall Quinn (obviously for an insight on his native Ireland and a veteran of Italia '90), David James (for an insight into how to lose concentration at vital moments and a veteran of Euro 2004) and Robbie Savage (a veteran of Dancing on Ice).
ITV
Explaining the rules of the game to Chiles will be another star-studded team on ITV. Their boldest move has been well advertised already and I'm sure will be alluded to constantly during each match. Roy Keane and Patrick Vieira, locking horns in the battle to see who was the most annoying Premier League great of the last twenty years. Seriously though, these two know a thing or two about midfield play and, despite their more than questionable characters, I like listening to them. United fans aren't quite sure whether they are allowed to like their former skipper since he fell out with Ferguson but he certainly doesn't mince his words. On the other hand, Gunners fans aren't sure whether they
should like their former skipper who, like most of their players, has ended up at the Etihad. I'm not too interested in whether they like each other though, just as long as they spend some time talking about the football.
Jamie Carragher will be a interesting one. He has always been described as a football anorak and will have no problem telling the viewers how it is. Obviously the biggest concern with Carragher will be the accent which, when he gets excited, is normally only audible for dogs but he clearly wants to follow the Gary Neville model of retirement soon. I've absolutely no doubt Carra will be a manager at some stage and this is his chance to show people that he knows his stuff. Usually the forgotten man of ITV, Gareth Southgate, is actually quite good too. His work for the FA on grassroots development shows that he is another 'student of the game' and, with the exception of pressure penalties, his advice is normally worth listening to.
Roberto Martinez is definitely a step up from Big Sam for ITV. Allardyce's opinions on Spain's use of Tiki-Taka football would be as useful as asking Nick Griffin to help UEFA sort out Ukraine's racism problem. Martinez, on the other hand, is always engaging and I'm sure he is looking forward to getting as far away from Dave Whelan as possible.
Speaking of which; I'm quite surprised no one thought of inviting Dave. Wonder what the odds are of him popping up on one of the channels before the tournament ends?